I am „not exactly“ a National Socialist. I do not wish to be a culturally misappropriating anti-wigger. I do have my own radical ideas. And should my ideas and any works I ultimately achieve be judged by posterity to be National Socialist, then thus will I be honoured. So why do I fly the Swastika?
There are positive reasons, and a negative reason. The latter deserves some attention first; for it is precisely the same reason why many people avoid the Swastika, namely, that it will displease the Jew and thus make their work „socially unacceptable“ in Judaized society. Now, why should I desire such a thing? Turn briefly to the historical record:
Schopenhauer excoriated the Jew in most unequivocal terms. How does the Jew respond? „He establishes a Schopenhauer Society.“
Voltaire was especially vehement in his condemnation of the Jew. (Also in his contempt for African Negroes.) Jewish professors either conveniently omit that part, or try to spin it away with divers fantastic evasions, dissimulations, and sophistries.
Shakespeare wrote an „anti-Semitic“ play which was alternatively titled, „The Jew of Venice“ (a parallel to Marlowe’s extremely anti-Jewish „The Jew of Malta“). It carried a morale against Jewish usury, Jewish hate, and Jewish vengefulness. And some early editions of „The Merchant of Venice“ bore the subtitle, here changed to modern orthography: „With the Extreme Cruelty of Shylock the Jew towards the said Merchant, in cutting a just pound of his flesh“:
How does the Jew respond? Around 1800, Shylock, the cruel and hateful Jew usurer, suddenly became Shylock, the victim of anti-Semitic persecution. As it has occurred throughout history, the Jewish criminals against mankind recast themselves as their own victims’ victims!
Hamsun sent his Nobel Prize medal (for Literature) to Dr. Goebbels (a Doctor of Literature) as a token sealing their mutual respect. He wrote that the cause of „anti-Semitism“ is Jews. And he eulogized Adolf Hitler as a „warrior for mankind“. After the War, he and his family suffered terribly from the revenge of the Judeo-Masonic Norwegian government. Yet nowadays, just within the past decade or two, he is being „rehabilitated“—meaning that his work is being stolen, twisted, and misappropriated by people whom he hated.
Upon considerable study of this problem, I have concluded that the best means to prevent the Jew from eventually misappropriating my work for his own ends seems to be to publish it under a Swastika imprint. It is true that the Jew, whose language contains the concept of chutzpah, is so audacious in his swindles that I fear even the Swastika may be no guarantee. But empirically, National Socialist publications thus far seem to be safe from Jewish intellectual piracy.
In positive terms, the Swastika is firstly a dedication to Aryan mankind, and secondly an homage to the greatest Aryan leader who ever lived. But in negative terms, it is thirdly a ward against the thieving Weltfeind: A sign declaring, „Jew, out! Handen weg! No Jews allowed! Ever!“
For I do not want to ever be „rehabilitated“ by the Jew. I do not want for Jewish professors to ever „teach“ (that is: deconstruct, dismember, and corrupt) my work. I do not wish for the product of my mind and my soul to ever be praised by Jews. It is not for them.